Vinaya — Regras dos Monges (Bhikkhu Vibhaṅga) — Criticizing a legitimate legal procedure

1Origin story
At one time when the Buddha was staying at Sāvatthī in Anāthapiṇḍika’s Monastery, the monks from the group of six were misbehaving, but when a legal procedure was being done against any one of them, they would object.

2On one occasion the Sangha had gathered on some business. The monks from the group of six were busy making robes and so they gave their consent to one among them. When the monks saw that only one monk from the group of six had come, they did a legal procedure against him. When he returned to the monks from the group of six, they asked him, “What did the Sangha do?”

3“It did a legal procedure against me.”

4“We didn’t give our consent for that. If we had known that a procedure would be done against you, we wouldn’t have given our consent.”

5The monks of few desires complained and criticized them, “How could the monks from the group of six give their consent to legitimate legal procedures and then criticize them afterwards?” … “Is it true, monks, that you did this?”

6“It’s true, sir.”

7The Buddha rebuked them … “Foolish men, how could you do this? This will affect people’s confidence …” … “And, monks, this training rule should be recited like this:

8Final ruling
‘If a monk gives his consent to legitimate legal procedures, and then criticizes them afterwards, he commits an offense entailing confession.’”

9Definitions
A:

10whoever …

11Monk:

12… The monk who has been given the full ordination by a unanimous Sangha through a legal procedure consisting of one motion and three announcements that is irreversible and fit to stand—this sort of monk is meant in this case.

13A legitimate legal procedure:

14a legal procedure consisting of getting permission, a legal procedure consisting of one motion, a legal procedure consisting of one motion and one announcement, a legal procedure consisting of one motion and three announcements; done according to the Teaching, according to the Monastic Law, according to the Teacher’s instruction. This is called a “legitimate legal procedure”. If he gives his consent, and then criticizes the procedure, he commits an offense entailing confession.

15Permutations
If it is a legitimate legal procedure, and he perceives it as such, and he criticizes it after giving his consent, he commits an offense entailing confession. If it is a legitimate legal procedure, but he is unsure of it, and he criticizes it after giving his consent, he commits an offense of wrong conduct. If it is a legitimate legal procedure, but he perceives it as illegitimate, and he criticizes it after giving his consent, there is no offense.

16If it is an illegitimate legal procedure, but he perceives it as legitimate, he commits an offense of wrong conduct. If it is an illegitimate legal procedure, but he is unsure of it, he commits an offense of wrong conduct. If it is an illegitimate legal procedure, and he perceives it as such, there is no offense.

17Non-offenses
There is no offense: if he criticizes it because he knows that the legal procedure was illegitimate, done by an incomplete assembly, or done against one who did not deserve it; if he is insane; if he is the first offender.

18The training rule on criticizing a legitimate legal procedure, the ninth, is finished.